iFS and Related MFS Treaty Combined into One Treaty

         iFS or imlay Family Society and MFS or                         Missouri Family Society Treaty of 2018

     Whereas, The iFS and the MFS Treaty is a Sovereign Treaty of declared Sovereigns of the united States of America and include the Republic of Missouri in its design. The iFS and MFS is comprised of human beings of like minds working together to bring about a New World Order of Voices of members to be heard on a worldwide basis. The World, in total and general, shall take notice of the voices of the iFS and MFS Treaty and recognize those voices as Sovereigns.

     Whereas, a Sovereign is defined as a human being, who is a breathing, thinking, and decision making individual, entitled to make their own decisions about their own lives and their immediate families. No other human being, corporation, legal/lawful entity, or Contract created entity shall interfere with the decision making abilities and follow through of any declared Sovereign of the iFS/MFS.

     Whereas, a Contract Created Entity is defined as any organization, including Corporations or governments, with a contractual agreement,  including the Five (5) elements of the contract required as per Law of Contract. The Five elements required include: The purpose of Contract, specifically named parties of the Contract, Consideration or agreements of all parties to the Contract, the time period required for completion of the contract, and signatures of all parties affixed to the end of the Contract. Any lack of the Five elements of the Contract does not constitute a lawful Contract, thus making the Contract null and void.

      Whereas, the iFS and MFS are societies created for the good and well being of all men, women, and children, especially to those human beings comprising the iFS and the MFS  membership. All members of the iFS and MFS communities are entitled to full protection of their Right to Sovereignty, under the umbrella of the iFS and MFS and those Rights are to be enforced by the members of the iFS and MFS communities, by using any means available, including defensive extreme force, if need be. All encroachment and Trespass by any foreign entity of the iFS and MFS Treaty shall be repelled with extreme force, if needed, and all family trees associated with the condemned encroachment and/or Trespass shall be liable for all damages and shall pay a fine of not less than 50,000 credits, whether electronic or by script, for reparation for damages, for each individual and incident committed. Corporations or Contract created entities, hiring these individuals, shall be liable for 500,000 credits or script fine for Reparation of Damages, in accordance to the crimes committed by their Contracted employees.

     Whereas, Extreme Defensive Force is defined as force used, equivalent to or exceeding the force used by any foreign entity to commit their act of encroachment or Trespass against the iFS and MFS Treaty and of its members. All Corporations and Contract created entities shall be liable for any and all damages incurred from those criminal actions.

     Whereas, Corporations are defined as a dead wood business for any monetary compensation, created under the Law of Contract, or are any governments creating any Law, using dead wood procedures and for monetary compensation, by use of any elected Legislator or any type of law maker, and which Law contains any vague definitions within it. Legislative Law, Statutes, and ordinances fall under the jurisdiction of Law of Contract and must follow suit for the required elements comprising that Law under the Law of Contract. No Law created by any Legislator or law maker is enforceable within the Boundaries of the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018, and thus NOT enforceable against any member of the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018, without that member's expressed written permission. Coercion and force used to gain signatures of Contracts or Law, makes the Contract or Law null and void. The voice of the Sovereign shall take precedence over any voice of any slave notated servant of the people, in any court proceeding. The Servant shall not have a Sovereign voice.

     Whereas, All Sovereigns, of the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018, are declared Diplomats and are entitled to Diplomatic Immunity, no matter where those Sovereigns travel or walk. iFS and MFS Diplomats shall be awarded the full protection of Sovereignty and Diplomatic Immunity by their arrival into any country of the World.

     Whereas, the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018 creates its own Judicial system within its boundaries and is subject to NO foreign judicial systems of any foreign entities to the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018. The Judicial System of the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018 shall be comprised of three (3) appointed Judges ( a Tribunal) by the membership of the iFS and MFS community. These three Judges shall be Sovereigns of the iFS and MFS community and shall have decision making abilities to determine the reparation fines to be issued. 

     Whereas,The defendant has the opportunity for appeal, but that defendant is limited to appealing to the International Criminal Court (ICC) located in The Hague, Netherlands. Since the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018 is an international treaty, the Judicial System is the final determining factor of the iFS and MFS communities, and then must be appealed to the international level of the Judiciary, hence the ICC. All decisions of the iFS and MFS Judicial Tribunal require reparations for damages to be paid at the nominal rate, on demand, and any appeals to the ICC requires the fine to rise to ten (10) times the nominal rate for said reparations, also on demand. All reparation fines apply to defendants and the Corporations those defendants work for under Contract. (example: Tribunal = 50,000 for individuals; 500,000 for the Corporations they work for under Contract; Appeals = 500,000 for individuals, and 5,000,000 for the Corporations they work for under Contract) Corporations and governments shall have the option to provide tax free land, without any encumbrances, in lieu of fines, and shall allot that land to the iFS and MFS Trust, now created under the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018.

     Whereas, the law enforcement of the iFS and MFS community shall reside within the boundaries of the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018 and shall be administered by any armed member of the iFS and MFS community. All members of the iFS and MFS community shall have the opportunity to be armed and carry arms at all times, if they so desire. It shall be the duty of every member of the iFS and MFS community to protect the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018 and its boundaries, at all times, from any foreign entity encroaching upon or Trespassing those boundaries.

      Whereas, Public Law Enforcement is defined as any human being, who is contractually a member of any organization that claims law enforcement status,  who has knowledge of their authority of enforcing Laws, created by authorized law makers, elected by their Sovereign Bosses, for example: the American People, and are bound by contract to enforce the Laws exactly and only as it is written, shall be known as a direct part of the Law Enforcement Community. This Law Enforcement Community is bound by their own internal rules and regulations created by their founders. (called and defined as its "Law Enforcement BOX") Whereas, any Law Enforcement person shall have the opportunity to operate outside their own box, by contracting with a private human being to enforce the laws created by that private human being, who holds Sovereign status, and are thus, bound by the contract then created. Any enforcement of any Laws, not created by private contract, shall be determined to be damage to any human being of Sovereign Status. 

      Whereas: let it be known that all public servants of government, corporations, or any other organization, created by contract, shall give up their Sovereign status and become a Slave to the organization that holds their contract. Public Servants are defined as human beings, without Sovereign Status, contracted to doing business for private or public organizations, such as government, whether Federal, State, County or local, and organizations whether private or public. Public Servants can only recover their Sovereign Status by stepping out of their Contracted Boxes and resuming their private lives. Public Servants are defined too, as registered members of public government and organizations, and retain NO Sovereign Status so long as they remain employed to do the bidding of those governments or organizations. No Public Servant has authority to control or coerce any Sovereign Boss to give up their Sovereign Status at any time.

     Whereas, the Law of Fairness shall be the basis and fundamental law for the iFS and MFS community and for the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018. The Law of Fairness, created in 2011, shall be appended to the end of the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018 and notated as Amendment 1. The Law of Fairness gives the greater scope of how the iFS and MFS Treaty of 2018 shall work, from this time forward and into the future.

     Whereas, this Treaty is created by my hand and with my mind as a Sovereign. This document will be signed as c. david imlay in Missouri Republic.


c. david imlay
Republic of Missouri

Amendment 1

The Law of Fairness

INTRODUCTION: 

The core essence of human life is the right of Self-determination. No government, government entity, individual, or group, including any and all religious doctrine has the right to determine how an individual should live his or her life; as long as, the individual’s actions are in accordance with the Law of Fairness and the Laws of Nature. No individual, group, government or government entity has the right or authority to impose their will through the use of deception, threat of deception, threat of force, fraud, coercion, threat of initiated force or initiated force on any individual who has reached the age of reasoning.*

The right of self -determination includes any and all choices that encompass the liberty and freedom of the individual to determine how said individual will procure income, real property, worldly possessions, choice of social compact and happiness; as long as, said individual is abiding by the Law of Fairness and the Laws of Nature.


Stipulation 1: Any individual, group, or government using deception, threat of deception, fraud, coercion, threat of initiated force, or initiatory force upon another individual, group, government, social compact, or their property or contracts is violating the Law of Fairness and such actions are strictly prohibited.


Stipulation 2: Any individual, group, government or government entity not abiding by the Law of Fairness will be subject to corrective measures according to the depth and scope of the infringement as adjudicated by the governing body whose jurisdiction includes the location where the infringement occurred. Use of force is justifiable ONLY in the event of the violation of the Law of Fairness, including violation of Stipulation 1, by any individual, group, or government or government entity.


Stipulation 3: There shall be no exceptions to Stipulations 1 and 2.* Age of Reasoning When an individual believes that he or she has reached the age of reasoning, that individual can formally express his or her intent to pursue his or her right to self-determination within the community, and accept full responsibility for their actions -- under the Law of Fairness. At the moment of the acceptance by the community, the expression will be considered recognized.

Sovereignty K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid)

  SOVEREIGNTY PART 1

Welcome to this edition of the Rebel Rider Review. What is it that you do not understand about "YOUR" Sovereignty and where did it come from?

Learning about your Sovereignty is technically pretty simple really, but most people make it a complicated issue. People tend to read more into being a Sovereign and apply issues or ideas to their life which doesn't mean anything at all. When it comes to you being your own Sovereign, then only your own decisions for yourself even matter at all.

First, how do you get your Sovereignty in the first place? You have always had your own Sovereignty from the very beginning and just didn't realize it. So, what is Sovereignty and what is necessary for me to continue to be Sovereign, and how does it apply to my everyday life? Okay, let's start with the definition of Sovereignty and then see where that applied to your life and the life you live, even today.

Sovereignty:  Sovereignty is the personal ability to make rational decisions, to think independently, and to act upon those decisions made.

Pretty simple, isn't it? What most people do not realize is that each and every one of them make decisions from rational thoughts that are created in their own minds. This is the beginning of their Sovereignty, but it requires something else. To be a Sovereign any person, or human being, creates a thought or idea in their mind, and rationalizes how that thought or idea can be brought to the reality stage and actually transfers that thought or idea into an everyday activity.

Sovereign: A human being that creates a thought or idea in their minds and brings that thought or idea into reality of "Their" world or environment that they reside.

A Sovereign can not be an animal, a rock, a State or Republic, or a Country. An animal can not make a rational decision. A rock can not make a rational decision. States or Republics can not make rational decisions. A country can not make a rational decision.  Some people will say that a State/Republic or a Country can be Sovereign, but I disagree. States/Republics and Countries are not human beings. States/Republics and Countries are nothing more than locations with drawn up paper contract governments or rules and have no brains or thinking capacity to make decisions on their own independently.

I can hear you saying this now. "Yes, States/Republics and Countries can be sovereign, because there are people or human beings running them." -------- What is the key word or words that you just uttered? ------- Human Beings or people, Right? ---------- Remember, only human beings or people have the ability to create thoughts or ideas and make decisions on those thoughts and ideas. Human beings are the only creatures that can reasonably think and create with their minds and  then react from those thoughts. Without any human being intervention, I challenge any State/Republic or Country to create a thought, make a decision, and then act upon that thought or decision. It can not be done by ANY State/Republic or Country at any time.

Keeping Sovereignty simple is what gives each human being their power. If anyone believes that someone else can have power over them, then they are not Sovereign or have given up their Sovereignty. Sovereignty in a simple sense is a God-given Right or a Right given to human beings by a Supreme Being not fully or entirely known to humans.

Sovereignty starts with the individual human being, as each human being is a "decider" for their own life or lives. That sovereignty then extends to the families of each of them. Even children in those families exercise sovereignty to a certain extent. Sovereignty is the voice of each human being in establishing boundaries which extend to them and with those to whom they associate. The extent of the Sovereignty remains in effect to the point, that sovereignty is lost when a human being voluntarily gives their service to another human being operating under the rules and guidelines as is stipulated in contracts.

Sovereignty is lost when any human being allows power to be given to another human being over them or gives their power over to rules and guidelines written out on paper. Contracts of any sort, including Law, only gain power when a human beings gives permission and follows what is written on that paper. Only those that follow the rules and guidelines written into a contract or law are the only ones who are bound to those rules and laws as it is written. Those ex-Sovereigns only hold power within the written rules and laws, once they follow those written issues and agree to become a part of that written contract.

When a contract member forces their ideology of their contract off onto another Sovereign, then they have violated the customary boundaries created by that Sovereign and/or their families. That is called trespass, and it is the inherent Right of the Sovereign to defend their borders or boundaries by any means available and with more force than is exerted onto them. No Contract or member of a contract has the authority to trespass against another human being's boundaries without suffering dire consequences for such acts. Besides no contract has the ability to move, breathe, think, or consume. Only animals, some plants and human beings have that ability. I have yet to see a contract sit up of its own accord without the help of a human being.

All Sovereigns have all authority over all other Contracts and members of that contract, when the members of the contract step outside the created boundaries of its writings. All members of a contract have lost their Sovereign inherited Rights and have become nearly exactly the contract itself. Those members have lost the ability to think, as the writings of the contract control what is thought, and how that members acts, especially within those borders thus created. Once that member of the contract steps outside that box of borders, then the contract has no further powers and that member is criminally responsible for their actions towards another Sovereign human being and must pay damages for that criminal act. Contracts can not have any power over another human being who has not signed up to be a member of that contract.

A contract can not extend its boundaries except within its own writings, as the contract can not own property or have a definite location. The owner of the property location has all authority over the contract, when the contract is placed inside the physical boundaries of that property. The owner of the property can extend his/her property boundaries by negotiating with the Sovereign of the neighboring property at recognized set rates.

Land or real estate can not re-evaluate itself without manipulation from another human being, BUT the value of the Land remains the same, as no Sovereign or human being can totally own the land, since it was created by someone or something other than themselves. In most cases, this is called Nature, as Nature can create or destroy, at will or when necessary, any land or its inhabitants. Nature remedies all of its ills for it to survive, as needed. If a human being is in Nature's path of cleansing, then Nature will warn that human being to prepare for that danger, by finding shelter or get out of its path. Nature exists through a balance of its own existence. Animals react to Nature by escaping to safer regions, and human beings learn to react through their mistakes, if they live through those mistakes.

So, in essence, Sovereigns rationally think, create plans, decide what is best for themselves, and then act accordingly to those plans and decisions made.

Conservatism or Communism or Total Freedom? You Choose

Here recently, I have been reviewing several of the conservative views or supposedly conservative views, and am starting to find out that a lot of conservative viewpoints are leading us more and more down the path to communism. I have been lately becoming more and more a supporter of the John Birch Society or JBS and their viewpoints of keeping our Constitution as our focal point in leading all of us down a path to total freedom. One such video I reviewed was the JBS review of ex-Speaker N. Gingrich. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWPz1Qdq1uI&feature=share) [this was given about a year ago]

When I entered the military back in 1970, one of the very first questions I was asked was whether I was a member of the JBS or John Birch Society. Needless to say, I said no and had no idea what the JBS was or what they stood for. If I had known of the JBS and knew their stance with military and the overall view of Communism, I might have questioned why I was asked that question, if I were to be going to defend our country from an actual force of Communism trying to undermine our own government.

Since getting out of the military complex, my curiosity got the better of me, so I started investigating what the JBS was and where they stood. As a matter of fact, my views have followed along the same lines of the JBS, in all reality. The JBS stance has been and still is for the individual and not for the group as a whole or collectivism. The Republican and Democratic and any other organized party are essentially collectivists as they support their own party groups first and leave the individual to fend for themselves. This leads to BIG GOVERNMENT, something that individualists detest in all essence.

Most parties of politics are on a collectivist movement and eventually leads to a Communistic takeover of the whole world (A New World Order but actually the OLD WORLD ORDER or OWO). Parties are not for the people in all essence but are for what they stand for first, and if you do not agree with some issues of that party, then you are demonized within and without those parties. You are NOT considered a prime candidate for their party, no matter how much you want to reduce the government and bring the power back to the people themselves. If you do not follow strict party lines then they feel you are an enemy of (their) state of system of beliefs. (State in the political arena is flatly stated as a position or stance, not a physical location)

So my questions to everyone is: Are you a Party Liner or are you an individualist? Do you wish for a group of people to rule over all of us or should the individual rule over themselves? If the individual should rule themselves, does the party or group tend to support you or demonize you?

Party affiliation subverts what you believe as what you need to do for yourself and eventually for others. This affiliation also divides society into little groups and leads to the eventual fall of the total society. This is what Communism hopes for. Kruschev stated this in his address to the US, that he would bury us from within. What better way to do it than to divide us so that we can be defeated more easily. AND we have been following this platform ever since. We create new laws that divide us. We fight amongst ourselves when it comes to electing a leader to guide us as a nation under a total collectivist ideology.

Collectivism gives the ideology that doing something for the whole is best and the hell with the individual, because that individual can be sacrificed for the greater good (Communist Manifesto). Just because we join groups of like mindedness, this is also a form of collectivism, and we do not recognize it. Even joining our own little groups still brings about the ideology of division amongst all of us, and the Communist Regime just sits back and smiles smuggly, because that was their plan in the first place. So all of America and the world has fallen into the trap set up for them in the very beginning.

Division really begins in the family, because families literally isolate themselves and their beliefs from other families and weaken the entire system we would really want to have for ourselves. To counter this division, everyone must come together and form or restore a system, that defines who we are specifically, and what we want specifically and not in vague ideologies.

Isn't it time to come together and form definitions that specifically show what every ideology we hold as Sacred? Do we want total Freedom or do we want others to make our decisions for us? If we define everything that we hold as Sacred, then there is no reason for anyone to not know where we stand, and we can keep from offending anyone.

One thing that governs our ability or inability to define ourselves is our inability to control our own emotions about what we believe in. If you or we allow our emotions to control what others should believe, then we have created a caste system where there is always someone below us, no matter where we are on a totem pole of power. Emotional beliefs are a detriment to society and keeps all of us from defining precisely who we are and where we stand.

Elections and Party Lines and Like minded groups are all formed under emotional ideologies and this even includes the Religious lines. Have you ever noticed that if you criticize any Party, any elected leader from any like minded group, or anyone's religion, that you are immediately defined as someone who is not viable to be a part of those groups? You will go to HELL, you are an enemy of the State, you are a terrorist, and so on and so on. This is emotional ideologies coming to the forefront.

If you are totally Free and exercising Freedom, then emotion plays NO important part of any beliefs. Emotional beliefs are a weakness of everyone who holds onto the beliefs that you are wrong to have any belief that is different from that one you hold. If you take full responsibility for you and you alone, then you have no reason to involve yourself into someone else's beliefs, until you are asked for your opinion. When you are not asked for your opinion, and express your opinion on that belief, even behind that individual's back, then you are trespassing onto someone else's beliefs where you have no business. Who gave you that authority?

When we look at the ideologies of Conservatism, Communism, Liberalism, and any other group ideologies, we are looking at Social Contracts. Are you a member of one of these ideologies? More than likely you are involved in one or more of them at any point in your life. Although you may be involved in them, are you signatory to them? Are you a signed up member of that ideology? If you are not directly signed up to one of these memberships, then you do not have any business being able to make any of the decisions of any of these memberships. Most of these memberships (interesting twist on what this means politically) are formed under written rules and regulations (not widely accepted laws created by the people themselves directly) especially for those systems.

Many people do not realize that when they ask their Representatives to create laws to govern them, that once the people have given their permission for those Representatives to make those laws, that those Representatives create laws in their own version of what the people want. Representatives create the laws in their own words and protect themselves from ever having to follow those laws for their entire lifetime. They take the ideas from the people and twist those wants around, to where the people are forced to follow the ideology created for them, even if it is not totally what they wanted in the first place. Most people believe that those Representatives can be removed for their inadequacies for the people, but how many have been removed immediately for those indiscretions? NONE! Many of their laws they created become the collective Social Contract of those who are too lazy to research what has been done to them or how to get out of following those laws, lawfully! Is your Signature on that law, so you can comment on it or change it? NO! So you have been duped over and over again to follow something that is not valid for you, because you are not a direct member of that contract.

People are so lazy that they consider politics as too complicated or unimportant that it doesn't concern them directly. What the people do not understand or comprehend is that they have accepted that law just by following one item listed within it, and so they are bound by that law until they finally realize it does not apply to them. Those laws only apply to those who are signed to that law (sponsors and cosponsors of that written law). Representatives mainly tell people they are not bound by the law but show no proof of that statement, because that would undermine their control over everyone. Representatives advise law enforcement to FORCE the lower classes of people to follow the law through word of mouth and interpretation. But if you read the law exactly as it is written, you would find a different meaning to that law. People are so lazy they will only listen to people who they consider authorities and interpret law in their own versons, and the people will follow that law as it is TOLD to them, not as they read it.

In order to counteract what has been perpetuated onto them, people MUST re-educate themselves in what the law is really saying, instead of taking someone's word as gospel. When you take the word of someone else as an authority, then you have agreed to become a slave to their whims and wishes, and do not have the ability or gumption to make a decision of your own and live by that decision. Freedom requires that you take total responsibility for what you say, think, or do 24/7. Otherwise you become the fodder for someone else to control you, and what you say, think, or do. You are nothing more than a SLAVE! You gave up your Freedom for some convenience of someone else deciding, for you, what you may do.

When you give up your Freedom for convenience of someone else making your decisions for you, then you have given your rights away and deserve to live under Communistic or Fascist rule, not law. You have agreed to become the Slaves to the ideology, that those Rulers have signed up to, and agreed to use against you, collectively.

Once you give up your rights, it then becomes a physical fight to regain them for your own use, and maybe you will lose your life for that fight, unless you possibly join forces together to make battle for those rights. Be prepared to take back those rights by force if need be, and of which belong to you exclusively, and defend them by any means available, to insure you never lose them again. This means, if you have to go into a personal war on a life or death situation over your rights, then prepare to win that battle at all costs, no matter who lives or dies. There can be no remorse for your decision in the end, only responsibility. If it is good for the individual, then it becomes good for the whole, when you help to defend the rights of others, even if they differ from your own, and they do not trespass on your own Social Contract. That is the only boundary. Your drawn up plan of action or Contract is your boundary, and everyone else must become aware of it through public exposure and exercise their own ability to understand it and honor it.

As long as you are explicit and well defined in all that you design in your plan of action, then you have done all that is needed to defend that plan of action or Contract from whatever source that tends to trespass on those boundaries, with no regrets and answer to no one else for your defense. Once there is trespass then your actions of self defense are justified, even through Nature which answers to no one else too. You have literally become one with Nature, when you design all that you are, and where you stand with a plan of action or Written Contract for yourself, in accordance with Nature.