BOSSES AND SLAVES AND DEFINED DEMOCRACY !!!

Who are the BOSSES? Who are the SLAVES? AND What is Defined Democracy? What you do not understand will shake you to your core, and you will find it really hard to bring this reality into your life, as you know it. Many of the SLAVES, that I will point out to you, will try to get you to believe, that they are not SLAVES to anyone or the DEMOCRACY. PLUS those SLAVES will use FORCE to make you follow what they say. I will put this in perspective at the end of this dissertation or Blog in how it relates to you personally.

First, lets define BOSS or BOSSES. The BOSS is the one in a corporate setting, the owner, the DECIDER, the manipulator, a SOVEREIGN, and the main one in control. Does anyone have a problem with this definition?

The BOSS does not answer to anyone else. He or she make all the decisions in every situation, (in his or her world) thus the BOSS is a DECIDER. The BOSS has SLAVES below him or her on his or her food chain, so to speak, thus he or she is a manipulator.  Since the BOSS does not answer to anyone and makes his or her own decisions in all situations, within his or her own world, and anyone entering into that BOSS's world to do his her bidding, is his or her SLAVE, thus making him or her a SOVEREIGN (THE DECIDER). The BOSS or SOVEREIGN is in control of his or her world and enforces his or her rules onto anyone who decides to volunteer to enter that BOSS's world, and have that BOSS make his or her decisions for them.

The BOSS only rules in his or her own world and now must make agreements with neighboring BOSSES of their own worlds around him. Every world has its own BOSS, and each BOSS can not or should not cross their own boundaries that they set by placing their own rules in place in their world, "without permission" of every BOSS around them. The separate BOSSES make gentlemen agreements between themselves, so they  do not violate other BOSS's rules, they have placed in their jurisdictions. (or worlds, so to speak) The gentleman's agreement is bound by word of honor and a handshake and then becomes sacred only to those who make those agreements. That agreement does not allow those BOSSES to cross any other BOSS's boundaries at any time, if they are not a part of that original agreement.

Now BOSSES can become SLAVES to all the other BOSSES of specific boundaries, BUT those BOSS/SLAVES must volunteer to become SLAVES. Those BOSSES can not be forced to become SLAVES prior to volunteering. Once a BOSS volunteers to become a SLAVE, then he or she agrees to follow the rules set out by the other BOSSES of that region. NO SLAVE can tell a BOSS or force a BOSS to do anything that SLAVE desires. The BOSS is the DECIDER not the SLAVE, as the SLAVE gave up his RIGHT to decide once he volunteered and got placed by those BOSS or BOSSES.

Not everyone is a SLAVE and can not be forced to become a SLAVE by anyone, even by someone else hired by a BOSS or a DEAD ENTITY, created by contract of a BOSS. The created DEAD ENTITY can ONLY operate within the world of the BOSS who created it.

Cities, States, and Countries are all DEAD ENTITIES created on paper, through a contract, by a BOSS or group of BOSSES, and each of these dead  entities MUST be put into a BOX and kept there, so it does not cross boundaries of other SOVEREIGN BOSSES. When that entity leaves its box and crosses the boundaries of even one other BOSS, then it has violated EVERY gentleman agreement established by that one BOSS, with every BOSS, he or she has an honored agreement with. In essence, this is an example of one BOSS or one group of BOSSES trying to force other BOSSES around them to become their SLAVES, by allowing their created entity to leave its box, and cross boundaries, it does not have permission to do, by the BOSSES surrounding that box, the entity is supposed to be contained in.

In true form, all BOSSES that are SOVEREIGN DECIDERS have all the power to protect their own world by any means available to them. Any BOSS, that crosses those boundaries without specific permission of the gentleman's agreement made between BOSSES, becomes a SLAVE to the BOSS, whose boundary, he or she just crossed. That offending BOSS has dishonored all agreements made with that unlawful trespass and is bound as a SLAVE to the BOSS, he or she offended, and can be punished, even by loss of life, for not following strict rules set up by the original BOSS.

Let's break this down into a form which can be understood by even a first grader. Are you a DECIDER? Do you make your own decisions? Are you the head of your household and make the decisions for your household? (your world in other words) When do your kids become DECIDERS? Are there more than one DECIDER in your household? Do you have a gentleman's agreement with any other DECIDER in your household, so that no one offends the other? Who holds the power in all respects?

On this breakdown, First, You are you, and no one makes decisions for you. ONLY you have that power. You are your own DECIDER. No one else thinks like you. As a DECIDER, you are SOVEREIGN, and no one can take that from you, except you. You make your own decisions, and you decide if you are to become a SLAVE to anyone else and follow what they tell you. When you give up making ALL decisions for yourself, then you become a SLAVE to anyone else, who makes your decisions for you. You volunteered all of your power to that one you follow.

Are you the head of your household? Do you make all the decisions made within your house, or do you share those decisions being made with someone else, such as your significant other or spouse? If you share even one decision made in your house, then you have made a gentleman's agreement with that other person. You retain your own decision making power but share other decisions with others in your house. ONLY DECIDERS living in your house 24/7 can make any decisions in that world. No one outside your house that does not live there, can not make any decisions about you or your family, at any time. That is your or any other DECIDER's job, and you or they must take responsibility for that job.

When do your children, within your home, become DECIDERS? When you stop and listen to your children and give any  type of consideration to their communication for that family life, the children then become a DECIDER, albeit it may be a limited decision. That can happen from the age of 5 to age 13 with limited decision making power. That limited decision making ability can be extended a little at a time from the age of 13 until 18, at which time, once they reach that top age, then those children make their own decisions, and then need to move out, so their decisions become all their own and not subdued by their parent's decisions, while they still live there.

Here is where BLOOD is one decider, that no one else can take away. BLOOD relations and decisions is a customary situation, where no one, who is not related by BLOOD, can make any decisions about what goes on between any one within the family stature. That is the most sacred of all laws of nature. All violations of rules set up by family customary law within the family, is handled by ONLY those related by BLOOD of the family. Any decision made and forced upon that family by anyone outside that family is criminal trespass and is handled by the family that was offended by that trespass. When one member of that family is offended, it offends the rest of the members of that family.

Adoption is the only other method where an outsider has BLOOD relations with the family that adopted them. Adoption does not allow that adopted one's blood member family to enter into any decisions made within the family structure of that adopted one's new family. 

Family is all power in all essence. All power flows outward away from the family, and no power may be exerted back into that family structure by anyone outside of that family. 

When that family assists to create governments, whether local, county, State, or  Federal, then that family power is exerted outwardly all the way to Federal and beyond. The only power exerted by the Federal government is outwardly to other governments outside the borders of this country. No Federal power can be exerted back onto the States, as the State governments created the Federal government. State government can exert its power only to the County and Local governing agencies and NEVER back onto the people who inhabit or live in them. County officials can ONLY exert their power back onto Local governments. Local governments can only exert their power back onto itself and no farther. None of these governments have authority over any Family at any time. All Constitutions NEVER  gave government SLAVES the power to control their BOSSES. (the PEOPLE, in all essence)

Defined DEMOCRACY. What is it? DEMOCRACY is defined as meaning the majority ruling over the minority, thus making the minority a SLAVE to the  majority. Majority means large right? And minority means small, correct? Ok if we apply this to government, who is the majority in all respects? The people of this country, right? Who is the minority then? If we go back to the definition, the minority are SLAVES, correct? 

Who are the correct SLAVES in government? The politicians or the ones who volunteered to become SLAVES, right? The people, in all respects are the BOSSES or the SLAVE holders, right? 

Then WHY do the BOSSES allow their SLAVES to dictate rules to them, when the BOSSES are the ones supposed to be in control? Have you just volunteered to become the SLAVE'S SLAVE? Seems like that is true. Then you have become a true SLAVE to the ones, who keep control and REMAIN as BOSSES over all SLAVES. You gave up all your SOVEREIGN DECIDER rights to become a SLAVE voluntarily. You have no voice at all, because you gave up your voice, to be decided by the SLAVES that own you, and the BOSSES that own all SLAVES.

I repeat. You as a family member, have the ONLY power over all SLAVES. If you agree to anything sent down by a SLAVE and also agree to follow it, then you have volunteered to become a SLAVE right along with them. The majority hold all the power, and when you agree to follow a SLAVE, then you have lost all of your power. You are now a part of the minority. You have no voice and are not allowed to speak in any family tradition. (exactly as in the AVATAR movie)

I tend to analyze all movies that I watch, and each and every one of them project this same idea. The AVATAR movie projected it, the exact same way as was described above. Everything is originated in the Family, and it is the Family that must rise up and eliminate all enemies to the Family existence. It requires all Families to rise up together to defeat those that try to destroy it and their beliefs. Those Families or CLANS are the only ones who can protect this country and their own worlds from outsiders, (Sky people) who have elected to not belong to that world, but to take it for their own.

Follow The MONEY!!!

The Power Question

"For a few to be immortal, many must die." -- from the film In Time.

Who has all the power in the world? The People? The elected representatives of the People? Or is it the banks, corporations, bond markets, dynastic families, hereditary monarchs and the super rich?

Answer? - FOLLOW THE MONEY. The flow of money is the flow of power. Dollars are the amoral units of power and are overwhelmingly held by the amoral (or indeed immoral) super rich. The closer you are to the money flow, the more you can divert into your own pockets, hence the incredible wealth of bankers. The further you are from the flow, the poorer you are. The public good, merit, morality, fairness, justice and rationality play no part at all in the money flow.

The more dollars you have, the more powerful you are. The fewer you have, the more you become invisible. No one sees you and no one listens to you. You are "power deficient", hence irrelevant. Isn't it time to be seen and heard? Isn't it time for the public good and General Will rather than the private good (of the rich) and Particular Will (of the rich) to shape the power equation and dictate the money flow?

Money is a "proximity phenomenon" - the closer you are to its source, to its flow, the better. So, the rich ENSURE they are in closest proximity, while the ordinary people find themselves very far away. Those who are furthest of all from the money require State hand-outs, charity or must beg. They are held in almost universal contempt, yet their central problem is nothing but being too far from the money flow, and that can happen for all sorts of reasons. African Americans, for example, have never been allowed near the money in any significant numbers, hence have never stood a chance. Jews, on the other hand, went out of their way to be close to the money, and succeeded spectacularly. Most of all, the rich CONTROL who gets near the money. You are permitted to come close only if you're a member of their privileged cartel. The whole system is rigged against you. In a free world, the People, not the rich, not the Zionists and WASP Freemasons, must be in charge of who has proximity to the money.

1% (the rich) command and 99% (the poor) obey. Isn't it time for genuine People Power rather than the fake version served up by dumbocracy? Then the People must take the money of the rich - or we'll be their slaves forever. In this time of global financial meltdown, anyone who does not advocate a vast and unprecedented redistribution of wealth from the rich to the People is an Enemy of the People. Any defence of the rich is an attack on the People.

The Old World Order is dead. It's time to push it into its grave.

Free market capitalism has demonstrated that the market controls the economic and hence political agenda. Who and what constitutes the market? What is the market's purpose? Who elected any of the participants in the market? What are the political affiliations of these participants? How wealthy are they? In what way do they express the General Will of the People? Is the market designed to operate in the public good? Do our political leaders have any control over the market? Do they know exactly how the market functions and how it contributes (or not) to the public good? Do they know the identities of all the market participants and their respective agendas? Are they able to inform the People exactly what role the market plays? We all know the answer. Our leaders are clueless. They don't control the market; the market controls them.

The market constitutes an unelected, unaccountable, extra-political entity that nevertheless dominates the political space and can bring down presidents, prime ministers and entire national economies. It can provoke global economic crises and yet governments have ZERO control over it. Don't you find that somewhat odd? How can anyone talk of the people being in charge of the political process if the market dictates government policy? Free markets and democracy are INCOMPATIBLE. You cannot have a democracy if you have a market-controlled economy external to the political process and unaccountable to the electorate.

Democracy likes to trumpet the fact that you can remove unpopular politicians and governments, implying that you get the government you choose, yet there is no mechanism whatever for removing the controllers of the marketplace, the people who run free market capitalism hence the people who actually run democracy. If you can't remove them then you have no power at all and you are at their mercy.

The rich aren't stupid. They gave people democracy because they knew it changed nothing. The market retains all of the real power and THEY are the market. If the rich can't be removed from the market for corruption, greed, the pursuit of naked self-interest and actively acting against the public good then the people have no power. Democracy is a sham. The truth is that the market and its controllers are beyond the reach of the electorate while completely controlling the fate of the electorate. They are outside democracy and yet they run the democratic system. Is that not genius? The legions of dumbed down, manipulated and brainwashed masses who will fight to the death for democracy haven't noticed that their political system is a farce and gives them no power at all. Democracy is simply a disguised plutocracy - rule by the rich - operating via the "sacrosanct", unregulated market where the rich hold all of the cards and the poor have no say.

It need not be like this. "Social" capitalism, as opposed to free market capitalism, is structured to ensure that there are no extra-political entities that dictate to governments and are capable of destroying the economy. Markets must be subordinated to politics, not the other way around. Every element of the political process must be defined (because how can you understand, regulate and control undefined entities) and must be subject to the will of the people; otherwise it's ridiculous to talk of "people power". The market is neither defined nor does it have any connection whatever with the public good.

Who are the authors of free market capitalism? - THE RICH.

Who are the beneficiaries of free market capitalism? - THE RICH.

Who are the controllers of the economic and political agenda? - THE RICH.

WAKE UP! Democracy and its diabolical twin - free market capitalism - must be abolished. It's time for Meritocracy and social capitalism operating in the public good.

"It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution by tomorrow morning." -- Henry Ford

What is the single most important fact for you to grasp about the world? It is that whoever controls the money controls everything else. Therefore a political system such as dumbocracy that gives people the vote but gives them no money and no say over the private individuals, private banks and private corporations that control the money is never anything but the illusion of surrendering power to the people. The ancient controlling elites remain the same as ever. As an act of psychological genius, they gave the people the pretence of power while they maintained iron control of actual power. The only reason they agreed to dumbocracy was that they saw how it would deliver up a servile, compliant, docile population who would delude themselves that they were "free" and in charge, hence would never revolt. Freedumb and dumbocracy are the greatest acts of deception ever devised (apart from Abrahamism, that other masterful con that made billions bow to Satan and call him "God"!). They have fooled the dumb masses in every possible way.

If you want a new world with the people in charge then hear this - dumbocracy must be destroyed and the people must take control of the money. Any other suggestions are bullshit and a supreme waste of time. Without control of the money, the people have nothing and are permanently powerless. The formula for true freedom? - follow the money and seize control of it. There shouldn't be a single private bank run by private individuals serving their own agendas on this planet. Once you realise that, the way forward is simplicity itself, but the elites will of course do all in their power to make you dance to their old tunes and reject any New World Order of authentic people power. The entire debate about economics, politics and freedom is reducible to just a single question - who should control the money; the people or a small group of exceptionally rich private individuals unaccountable to the people yet controlling the people? Everything else is propaganda. So, whose side are you on? It's time to choose.

"It's better to die on your feet than live on your knees." -- Emiliano Zapata

"You understand that in this election, the greatest risk we can take is to try the same old politics with the same old players and expect a different result." -- Barack Obama

What did Obama do when he got into power? He appointed the same old players, tried the same old politics, and got the same old results! That's democracy for you. Only a madman would keep trying the same old failed formula. Democracy is no longer tenable. It's time for meritocracy.

The top 3 million Americans (1%) own 33% of the nation's wealth - 32 times more than their fair share. (Some estimates put it as high as 42%, and growing.)

The bottom 150 million Americans (50%) own 3% of the country's wealth - 16 times less than their fair share.

The next 149 million Americans (49%) own 64% of the country's wealth - 0.3 times more than their fair share.

In other words, 1% are having a ball, 49% are doing slightly better than OK, and 50% are in hell. Where's the Revolution? How can you treat half of your population like shit in order to allow 1% to live like kings? Why do the 50% tolerate it? It's the 49% who are the accomplices of the elite 1%.

Imagine life as a 100 metres race. 49% of the people are more less at the starting line, but 1% are 32 metres up the track. Their 100 metres race is only 68 metres long! As for 50%, they are 16 metres behind the starting line. They have to run 16 metres before they even join the race. (Many don't get that far: they never start.) Ask yourself a very simple question - who will win this race and who will lose? Is there any doubt? The race is rigged from the beginning.1% are sure to win and 50% are sure to lose. As for the 49%, they need to break every world record imaginable to beat the 1%. they have to be one in a million! Do you fancy those odds? So why are you taking part in this race? Isn't it time for a new race where everyone lines up at the same starting line?

Meritocracy is based on the absolute destruction of the rigged race of life via the introduction of 100% inheritance tax i.e. an overwhelming advantage can no longer be passed on by rich parents to their children. All children, no matter the wealth of their parents, must begin at the same starting line as everyone else. No parent can rig the race. The 1% can no longer dictate the outcome of the race.

Many people claim to be meritocrats but when you mention 100% inheritance tax to them, all of the blood drains from their faces. You know what that means? - THEY'RE NOT MERITOCRATS!

"Democracy" literally means "people power" (demos - people; kratos = power). It was designed to stop rule by the rich elite. Look at "democratic" America. Who runs it? The rich elite - the top 1%!!! Why haven't the dumb "democrats" worked out that the elite have conned them yet again!

"There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning." -- US billionaire Warren Buffett.

There's a sucker born every minute." -- P.T. Barnum

Is your name on the "Suckers' List"? Isn't it time you removed it? FIGHT BACK!

*****

Between 2002 and 2007, two-thirds of American gains in wealth flowed to the top 1% of households, and that top 1% held a larger share of income than at any time since 1928, just prior to the Great Crash. In other words, extreme wealth always presages a crash, and the reason is simple - the extreme wealth came about by excessive greed on the part of the top 1%, leading to an unsustainable boom that automatically gives birth to a disastrous bust.

50 million Americans have no healthcare. More than 45 million Americans are on food stamps. More than 24 million can't find a full-time job. 14 million are unemployed.

The degree of inequality in America is on a par with Rwanda - yet America is supposed to be the richest and most powerful country on earth. America has failed, democracy has failed and capitalism has failed.

It's time for a change - and that means an entirely new political vision. MERITOCRACY. Only the irrational would persevere with an utterly failed and discredited political, economic and social system.